Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Linkedin button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button

Grandmother forced to become a ‘ health refugee ‘ and move to England to get …

  • Maureen Fleming, 63, was diagnosed with bowel cancer six years ago
  • Has been refused the life-extending drug cetuximab in Scotland
  • If she lived in England she would get the £10,000 treatment free on the NHS
  • She and husband Ian are now considering relocating to Newcastle

By
Anna Hodgekiss

12:14 EST, 16 May 2013


|

13:14 EST, 16 May 2013

A grandmother is being forced to become a ‘health refugee’ and move to England to get the cancer treatment she needs to extend her life.

Maureen Fleming, 63, was diagnosed with bowel cancer six years ago and was refused the drug cetuximab in Scotland.

She and her husband Ian are now considering relocating to Newcastle where
consultants say she may get the life-prolonging treatment on the NHS.

Cancer sufferer Maureen Fleming and her husband Ian are seriously considering moving from Scotland to England to get the life-extending cancer drugs she needs

Cancer sufferer Maureen Fleming and her husband Ian are seriously considering moving from Scotland to England to get the life-extending cancer drugs she needs

Their plight was raised directly with Alex Salmond during First Minister’s Questions at Holyrood.

The couple watched from the public gallery as Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont described them as ‘health refugees’.

They agreed to come to Parliament once all avenues were exhausted.

While cetuximab is free in England, cancer patients in Scotland have to pay about £3,000 a month for it.

Cetuximab was approved for use on the NHS by the Scottish Medicines
Consortium but the ‘decision to restrict its use’ was made as a result
of an application by the drugs company, said Mr Salmond.

Mrs Fleming, a retired secretary from Bonhill, West Dunbartonshire,
later said: ‘If you can afford to pay for the treatment, you get it. If
you can’t, you don’t. An option for us is to relocate down south or to
another area where we can get this drug.

‘I would just like to know why you can’t get it on the NHS when others get it.’

Paying for the treatment privately costs about £10,000, she said. When the money runs out, the couple feel it is ‘probable’ they will have to move.

They are already searching for suitable rented accommodation.

Mr Fleming, a 65-year-old retired shipyard supervisor, said: ‘We feel as
if the NHS is letting us down. I’ve worked all my life, I’ve worked
right up to when I retired last year.

Mrs Fleming was diagnosed with bowel cancer six years ago, and was refused the drug cetuximab in Scotland

Mrs Fleming was diagnosed with bowel cancer six years ago, and was refused the drug cetuximab in Scotland

‘We’ve three children with families of their own. They’ve all got that
work ethic that’s been instilled in them from their mum and I. Maureen
only stopped working to have kids, then back to work again.

‘So we feel as if we’ve contributed our NHS for 50 years and we can’t
get the drug that Maureen needs. We think it’s very unfair that as
citizens of here we have to move to England.

“We’ve got families and it would involve a bit of upheaval because we
do, like most grandparents, nursery runs, picking up the kids, school
runs, so our children can go to work. There’s that aspect too, that we’d
be giving up that to move to England.’

The couple, who have 10 grandchildren, approached Labour MSP Jackie Baillie more than six months ago to raise their concerns.

Mrs Fleming was described by her consultant as an ‘ideal candidate’ for the treatment.

Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont

Scotlands First Minister Alex Salmond

The couple’s plight was raised directly with Alex Salmond during First Minister’s Questions at Holyrood.  The couple watched from the public gallery as Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont (left) described them as ‘health refugees’

‘To pretend to people that there is a solution to these hugely difficult
questions that are being faced by every health service across the
world, in terms of efficacy of what drugs can be approved for use, is
misleading people entirely,’ Mr Salmond said.

Asked what Ms Fleming thought of the First Minister’s responses, she said: ‘Not a lot.’

She continued: ‘The drug is there, the treatment is there for anybody
that needs it. You’re not getting it because you’re not in this wee box.
If you can pay for it, it’s there for you. It seems unfair.’

In the debating chamber, Labour leader Ms Lamont said prescriptions for
aspirin and paracetemol can be free while cancer treatment can be
denied.

‘Scots with hayfever can get their prescription for free but Scots with
cancer may have to leave their homeland for treatment to save their
lives.

Cancer sufferer Maureen Fleming and her husband Ian are seriously considering moving from Scotland to England to get the life-saving cancer drugs she needs

Cancer sufferer Maureen Fleming and her husband Ian are seriously considering moving from Scotland to England to get the life-saving cancer drugs she needs

‘The
Flemings are a proud family. They are struggling to get together the
£10,000 needed for the first three months’ treatment. But they can’t
afford to pay for any more after that, so they are planning to leave
their home of 27 years and rent a flat in Newcastle because in England
they can get the drug for free.

‘Time
is short, so Maureen Fleming has come to this chamber today to hear
first-hand what is the First Minister’s advice to her and cancer victims
like her.’

A spokesman for the First Minister later criticised her assertion,
arguing that painkillers are frequently prescribed to long-term
sufferers of conditions such as heart disease or chronic pain.

Ms Baillie, the Flemings’ local MSP, said her party would ‘absolutely’ find the cash to offer more cancer drugs to patients.

 

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Very very sad situation that Scotland would not support this cancer victim however I do not support them moving to England and claiming NHS! Err if I moved to Scotland could I have free university fees paid…err no! Lets see which way the vote for their referendum. I vote that England have a referendum as to whether we keep Scotland lol bet I know the answer to that one! I hope this cancer victim gets her treatment but NOT at our expense being as blatantly rude the Scottish are about the English.

Melissa
,

UK, United Kingdom,
18/5/2013 18:17

Oh dear… is not independent yet.

Thinkpositive
,

here, United Kingdom,
18/5/2013 18:08

Presumably this kind of practice will be against the law if Scotland get their independence?

John Preston
,

Stoke on Trent,
17/5/2013 12:26

All paid for by ENGLISH tax payers!

Pardonmeforbreathing
,

Durham,
17/5/2013 12:13

As sad as it is, this is not recipricol is it. I wonder how the Scots would view an English patient going there for free prescriptions and treatment.

Happy Whammer
,

London,
17/5/2013 12:12

AND THEY WANT INDEPENDENCE !!!

Tanis
,

Marlow,
17/5/2013 11:53

A common story should they get their independence…..

DWW
,

Abergele,
17/5/2013 11:16

I read that while prescriptions are free in Scotland doctors were far less likely to prescribe the ones needed. Sadly the media uses the free prescription issue and the benefits ‘data’ to cause division but Scotland is a net contributor to the UK. Irrespective of the politics I hope the woman gets to spend many more years with her family.

Ms Hmmm
,

London, United Kingdom,
17/5/2013 10:38

I think with these super drugs there has to be some cut off ….- michelineb, uk, 16/5/2013 18:56 There is! It’s based on research – she’s an “ideal canditate” so therefore she should have the drugs. FYI I have cancer and get drugs from the NHS to extend my life by months or years based on scientific research. The median is 8 months. They test the type of cancer in order to ascertain whether there is a chance of it working. They give me a CT scan every 3 months to see if they are working and only 1 months supply in case I die in the meantime. DM probably won’t post this as they like to make trouble for the NHS – there is a system to prevent waste but most importantly extend life. Let’s face it I won’t get my pension or my bus pass so I don’t see a few thousand now as too much given I’ve paid my taxes. Also the pills replace traditional chemo which comes at a cost. Perhpas you’d like to tell my 3 children, 10, 7 and 3 my life isn’t worth extending.

biffa11
,

Guildford,
17/5/2013 10:34

Fair enough. As long as the english get free prescriptions, tuition fees and old age care if they move to Scotland.

dave
,

kent, United Kingdom,
17/5/2013 10:18

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2325641/Grandmother-forced-health-refugee-Scotland-England-life-extending-cancer-drug.html

Fat yoga studio welcomes all sizes

Follow us on Twitter @Yahoo7_health

Anna Ipox (center) teaches a class at her Fat Yoga studio in Portland, Oregon. (Photo: Fat Yoga via Flickr)

17278989

American Anna Ipox named her studio Fat Yoga, and she’s not shy about why.

“I say I’m fat cause, guess what, I know I’m fat,” Ipox told KPTV. “Our American script says, ‘No, you’re not fat, just some other euphemism, thick, fluffy, big-boned, portly, whatever.’”

“Fat is simply a descriptive word,” she explained on her company’s website. “We believe that a person should not be judged by the amount of fat they have, and that there is no “right” amount of fat. A person’s physical health cannot be determined from simply looking at their shape or weight.”

Ipox, who has practiced yoga since 2011, said that some traditional poses are too difficult for fat people to manage.

“Child’s pose is impossible of you have belly fat or thick thighs,” she said. But most yoga instructors “just have no idea what it is to have a big body.”

“I remember teachers pushing on my hips to make it happen,” she continued. “It’s not a flexibility thing and I couldn’t articulate any of that.”

Related: Yoga moves for work

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that adults get at least 2 hours and 30 minutes of moderate exercise every week (think brisk walking) and try to do “muscle-strengthening activities” for all major muscle groups twice or more each week. The activity can be spread throughout the week, as long as you’re being moderately to vigorously active for at least 10 minutes at a time.

Still, the people who most need to exercise are often the ones who are most likely to avoid it, simply because working out in public is too intimidating.

“You just have to do a little Google searching to see all the fat hate,” Ipox explained to KPTV. “Fat girls shouldn’t wear stretch pants, they shouldn’t wear white, they shouldn’t wear yoga pants and you’re not allowed to let your fat jiggle.”

Struck by society’s resistance to people who want to be fit but aren’t afraid to be fat, she decided it was time to open her own studio.

“I just realised I’m gonna make the place I want to go,” she said.

Related: Yoga for great sex

Fat Yoga opened in Portland in January, and drew a devoted following right away.

“We come here to have that space and hold that space and be healthy and get our sweat on and laugh and have a good time,” class member Melissa Brown told the TV station. “I really think she nailed it right on the head. Yoga for fat people. Fat Yoga.”

“I love the laid back and friendly atmosphere,” another student, Jennifer W, raved on Yelp. “I love the encouragement. I love that I can laugh while I do yoga and that I can already feel myself becoming stronger and more confident.”

Ipox says classes at Fat Yoga are open to everyone, no matter how much (or how little) they weigh – and, in fact, weight loss is not the point. “Fat Yoga has no objective or claim towards weight loss,” she says on her company’s website. “Frankly, we are not interested in it. We focus on strength building, flexibility, balance, self-acceptance and peace of mind.”

Article source: http://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/health/fitness/article/-/17277802/fat-yoga/

Phuket leads the way in healthy holidays

Island holidays are usually about relaxing, departing from routine and indulging yourself at a luxury retreat. “Healthy” they generally are not, as sunset cocktails, seafood buffets and hours lazing in the sun become the daily regime. But as concerns about our well-being grow, even our breaks are becoming infused with healthy alternatives. And Phuket, in Thailand, is leading the way.

Offering your not-so-ordinary holiday is Thanyapura, one of the province’s new hotels, just 15 minutes from the airport. From the outside, there is little to suggest that it is a dedicated sports hotel where guests receive free access to a 50-metre pool, six tennis courts, running track, full-sized multipurpose pitch, boxing ring, state of the art gym and a Powerplate studio.

Typical guests range from weekend warriors to the athletic elite – Hong Kong’s triathlon team trained there in December, attracted by the opportunity to do intensive workouts in a relaxed environment.

“People come to prepare for races. We have swim training, track training and cycle camps on offer from experts,” says hotel president Robert Huack.

Families seeking an alternative holiday have also been flocking to Thanyapura, which hosts an integrative health centre where guests can enjoy the latest anti-ageing treatments, and even a fully equipped kids’ club. Think healthy holiday village meets a top-notch sports club.

“We recently had a top Hong Kong executive stay here for two weeks with his wife just to get healthy,” says Huack. “Most of our food is organic and he and his family worked out in the morning and then spent the afternoon at the beach.”

Thailand’s tourism authority predicts the country will become the world’s leading health and wellness destination, generating a significant portion of the total expected tourism revenue of US$67 billion in 2014.

Phuket is leading the way, thanks to its accessibility (there are daily flights from Asia and Europe), infrastructure, and a growing pool of expatriate expertise attracted by the opportunity of building their careers in paradise.

Aleenta Resort and Spa Phuket, Phang Nga is one resort jumping on board the burgeoning health movement on the island.

Situated on the secluded Natai beach, 20 minutes north of the airport, on the main island just over Sarasin bridge, the small luxury boutique hotel has started offering personalised yoga classes to guests. It also offers detox, or a least a form of it.

“We offer a luxury variation of the detox, yoga and spa buffet,” says Paul Counihan, director of sales and marketing for AMHS Hotels. The hotel has an in-house yoga teacher who offers free yoga to guests before breakfast on the sand three mornings a week.

If guests elect for an Aleenta detox, they will be nourished with fruit juices and fresh, locally sourced vegetarian dishes throughout the day, while being cleansed and massaged at the hotel spa. Five national parks within a 45-minutes radius offer rafting, mud-biking and trekking – the resort does tours for those looking for a dash of adventure.

In the hills above Patong beach, alternative therapy is being combined with five-star pampering at Avista Hideaway Resort and Spa. The luxury hotel offers authentic Ayurvedic treatments by trained Ayurveda doctor, Alvin James. On arrival, guests are offered a complimentary Ayurvedic assessment after which they choose from a tailored treatment package of several days up to a few weeks.

Hailing from Kerala in India, where Ayurveda began, James explains that the popular style of Indian remedy, offered by many spas these days, involves more than simple massage.

“There are three stages to authentic Ayurvedic treatment: massages, cleansing through specific processes and then a diet regimen,” he says. “It is this combination of therapies which cleanses the body.”

The resort is the brainchild of Ramesh Khendry, who spends more than a third of his life travelling.

“I wanted to create a space where busy executives could enjoy a holiday while also creating more balance,” he says. “A kind of place I would like to take my family and unwind, and look after my health amid beautiful nature.”

Wider health issues are being tackled on the island. Phuket’s revitalising geography inspired its choice as a location for Bhavana Phuket, Asia’s first internationally certified rehabilitation centre, says founder and CEO Dr Kai Goh. Operating since August 2011, Bhavana is the only rehab and detox centre to receive an official Thai government hospital licence to dispense medication.

A registered psychiatrist who specialises in addictions, Goh was inspired to establish an Asian clinic several years ago, after he discovered that many of his patients in Britain and the United States were travelling to Asia to receive treatment. He chose Phuket as a location because he felt it had a lot to offer, he says.

“All the different boxes that you need to tick are in Phuket,” says Goh. These include world-class medical professionals, infrastructure and an internationally recognised standard of service.

As a destination, Thailand is cheaper than other countries in the region.

“The Bhavana centre gives people a proper timeout from their enabling environment in an idyllic destination.”

As health and wellness gain greater importance in our lives, it seems they will become more prominent in our holidays, too.

Besides, what better way is there to address the needs of your body, mind and soul than in an exotic location, with a cocktail still in close reach?

life@scmp.com

Article source: http://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/health/article/1242062/phuket-leads-way-healthy-holidays

Phuket leads the way in healthy holidays

Island holidays are usually about relaxing, departing from routine and indulging yourself at a luxury retreat. “Healthy” they generally are not, as sunset cocktails, seafood buffets and hours lazing in the sun become the daily regime. But as concerns about our well-being grow, even our breaks are becoming infused with healthy alternatives. And Phuket, in Thailand, is leading the way.

Offering your not-so-ordinary holiday is Thanyapura, one of the province’s new hotels, just 15 minutes from the airport. From the outside, there is little to suggest that it is a dedicated sports hotel where guests receive free access to a 50-metre pool, six tennis courts, running track, full-sized multipurpose pitch, boxing ring, state of the art gym and a Powerplate studio.

Typical guests range from weekend warriors to the athletic elite – Hong Kong’s triathlon team trained there in December, attracted by the opportunity to do intensive workouts in a relaxed environment.

“People come to prepare for races. We have swim training, track training and cycle camps on offer from experts,” says hotel president Robert Huack.

Families seeking an alternative holiday have also been flocking to Thanyapura, which hosts an integrative health centre where guests can enjoy the latest anti-ageing treatments, and even a fully equipped kids’ club. Think healthy holiday village meets a top-notch sports club.

“We recently had a top Hong Kong executive stay here for two weeks with his wife just to get healthy,” says Huack. “Most of our food is organic and he and his family worked out in the morning and then spent the afternoon at the beach.”

Thailand’s tourism authority predicts the country will become the world’s leading health and wellness destination, generating a significant portion of the total expected tourism revenue of US$67 billion in 2014.

Phuket is leading the way, thanks to its accessibility (there are daily flights from Asia and Europe), infrastructure, and a growing pool of expatriate expertise attracted by the opportunity of building their careers in paradise.

Aleenta Resort and Spa Phuket, Phang Nga is one resort jumping on board the burgeoning health movement on the island.

Situated on the secluded Natai beach, 20 minutes north of the airport, on the main island just over Sarasin bridge, the small luxury boutique hotel has started offering personalised yoga classes to guests. It also offers detox, or a least a form of it.

“We offer a luxury variation of the detox, yoga and spa buffet,” says Paul Counihan, director of sales and marketing for AMHS Hotels. The hotel has an in-house yoga teacher who offers free yoga to guests before breakfast on the sand three mornings a week.

If guests elect for an Aleenta detox, they will be nourished with fruit juices and fresh, locally sourced vegetarian dishes throughout the day, while being cleansed and massaged at the hotel spa. Five national parks within a 45-minutes radius offer rafting, mud-biking and trekking – the resort does tours for those looking for a dash of adventure.

In the hills above Patong beach, alternative therapy is being combined with five-star pampering at Avista Hideaway Resort and Spa. The luxury hotel offers authentic Ayurvedic treatments by trained Ayurveda doctor, Alvin James. On arrival, guests are offered a complimentary Ayurvedic assessment after which they choose from a tailored treatment package of several days up to a few weeks.

Hailing from Kerala in India, where Ayurveda began, James explains that the popular style of Indian remedy, offered by many spas these days, involves more than simple massage.

“There are three stages to authentic Ayurvedic treatment: massages, cleansing through specific processes and then a diet regimen,” he says. “It is this combination of therapies which cleanses the body.”

The resort is the brainchild of Ramesh Khendry, who spends more than a third of his life travelling.

“I wanted to create a space where busy executives could enjoy a holiday while also creating more balance,” he says. “A kind of place I would like to take my family and unwind, and look after my health amid beautiful nature.”

Wider health issues are being tackled on the island. Phuket’s revitalising geography inspired its choice as a location for Bhavana Phuket, Asia’s first internationally certified rehabilitation centre, says founder and CEO Dr Kai Goh. Operating since August 2011, Bhavana is the only rehab and detox centre to receive an official Thai government hospital licence to dispense medication.

A registered psychiatrist who specialises in addictions, Goh was inspired to establish an Asian clinic several years ago, after he discovered that many of his patients in Britain and the United States were travelling to Asia to receive treatment. He chose Phuket as a location because he felt it had a lot to offer, he says.

“All the different boxes that you need to tick are in Phuket,” says Goh. These include world-class medical professionals, infrastructure and an internationally recognised standard of service.

As a destination, Thailand is cheaper than other countries in the region.

“The Bhavana centre gives people a proper timeout from their enabling environment in an idyllic destination.”

As health and wellness gain greater importance in our lives, it seems they will become more prominent in our holidays, too.

Besides, what better way is there to address the needs of your body, mind and soul than in an exotic location, with a cocktail still in close reach?

life@scmp.com

Article source: http://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/health/article/1242062/phuket-leads-way-healthy-holidays

How three in four pharmacies give poor drugs advice: Patients’ health is being …

  • Which? sent undercover mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies
  • Big chains give a better service than High Street independents
  • Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

By
Jenny Hope

19:11 EST, 19 May 2013


|

19:11 EST, 19 May 2013

Some High Street pharmacies are giving customers poor quality and even dangerous advice about their medicines, claims a new survey.

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy.

The survey showed pharmacies in big chains and supermarkets give a better service than High Street independents.

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

Which? sent trained undercover mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies across the UK and an expert panel of three experienced pharmacists rated the advice they received.

It found some pharmacies are giving out advice without asking the right questions, with potentially serious consequences for their customers’ health.

Advice from pharmacies was given an unsatisfactory rating in around four in ten (43 per cent) visits overall, almost 10 per cent higher than a previous survey in 2008.

Which? sent mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies

Which? sent mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies

There was a marked difference in the quality of advice given from different types of pharmacies.
Independent pharmacies gave unsatisfactory advice more than half of the time compared to a third of the time for the leading chains and supermarkets – with no change on the last survey. 

In one scenario, a customer taking the drug warfarin to prevent blood clots requested a heartburn remedy called Pantoloc Control

Pharmacies should have asked basic but important questions about existing prescription medication because it can interfere with warfarin levels in the blood, leading to bleeding problems and even hospitalisation.

But the advice was rated unsatisfactory in 71 per cent of the visits – the worst finding.

On visits where counter assistants dealt with mystery shoppers without consulting a pharmacist, two thirds gave poor advice compared with one in four when involving a pharmacist.

Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said ‘Too many pharmacies are still failing their customers, with some potentially serious consequences.

‘We’re pleased that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the General Pharmaceutical Council recognise our concerns and are taking steps to tackle these issues. ‘Consumers should be able to trust the advice they receive from any pharmacy they visit.’

In a separate snapshot study, Which? also discovered that two-thirds of pharmacies did not follow the professional guidance by failing to explain there is no scientific evidence that homeopathy works.

Martin Astbury, president of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said ‘The pharmacists I know won’t recognise their own practice in the results Which? have shared with us.

Which? said that chains and supermarkets performed better in their study

Which? said that chains and supermarkets performed better in their study

‘The RPS wants to understand the underlying reasons for the differences highlighted by this report and how to improve consistency of the advice the public receive when they purchase medicines from a pharmacy. There are some areas which require improvement. 

‘We have commissioned the University of Nottingham to look internationally for best practice on the sale of medicines through pharmacy.  We will use the outcomes of this to make recommendations as to how pharmacists’ skills can be used most effectively in Great Britain to ensure the public get the best possible advice.’

The comments below have not been moderated.

Ayzee, 11:56 – you’ve missed out a fairly important bit there, even ignoring the misinformation/nonsense (most nurses aren’t prescribers for example, although some are, to varying degrees of sophistication/complexity). NAmely – diagnosis. Trying to diagnose most conditions from biochemistry or radiology alone would be like trying to sketch a map of the Grand Canyon when you’re only allowed to view four inches of it at a time. Through a pinhole. In the dark.

Yes, the blood tests show kidney failure – but why are the patient’s kidneys not working? There’s a hundred reasons and maybe one or two of them show up on the standard biochemistry tests done quickly in a local lab Not to mention, which tests do you request in the first place? The person who takes a history, examines and assesses the patient, formulates a diagnosis and then a plan (including what tests to do) and then carries it out, including procedures, referrals and prescribing meds, is the doctor. Sound useful yet?

angularboxoid
,

North East, United Kingdom,
21/5/2013 00:07

I have one ruel first before, I take any new medicine that is to read the leaflet that comes with them before I even consider taking it, And if I am still not sure if I should take it or not, I double check with the pharmacy.

trixiemoo
,

rhyl, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 22:17

The advice given by French pharmacists is horrible! They are all big believers in homeopathy and New Age remedies and they push that on people in lieu of conventional medication. And if you insist on conventional medication, eg for an infection, they undermine that choice.

Bliss
,

Paris, France,
20/5/2013 17:08

What about when the staff call out the list of prescription drugs that you’ve come to collect, I had to complain to head office about it and this was at one of the top pharmacies!

Flapjack
,

London, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 14:52

its not the pharmacists, its the ‘medically untrained assistants’ who think they know it all and will argue that two things with the same ingredient in but made by two different companys are totally different, just because the have a generic name and a product brand name….ie..panadol and paracetomol…..i love proving them wrong when they try to sell me the more expensive brand name instead of the cheaper generic name…..they still the say that in their opinion the more expensive brand is better. Its a big con to make you spend more money when you dont need to!

daves wife
,

hampshire, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 14:07

Our local pharmacist used to be a fount of knowledge about everything on the shelves. Last time I sought advice form the new pharmacist, he had to start reading the information on the packaging. There is a decline in standards.

Bram
,

Bushey,
20/5/2013 13:18

Makes you wonder what purpose doctors actually serve. Before you get all worked up, read what I have to say first. Pharmacists have all the knowledge about medications. Biochemists analyse samples from the body and can give a diagnosis for what the samples show. Radiographers look at imaging and can tell you what is wrong from the pictures printed. Nurses do everything else, including leading wards, medication prescribing, sorting out social care, consulting, dealing with bereaved patients and relatives well, delivering bad news, on top of a lot more tasks. Apart from a surgeon, I really fail to see what the purpose of a doctor is. And this is something that seriously needs to be looked at, because doctors get paid far too much for doing far too little. A drain on resources.

Ayzee
,

UK, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 11:56

i’ve only had one issue with the pharmacist, the first time i fell pregnant (aged 25) my first wisdom tooth started coming through it was very painful so spoke to the pharmacist to see what i was able to take while pregnant for pain relief she recommended clove oil, i brought it went home read the instruction leaflet which had a big DO NOT TAKE WHILE PREGNANT. so just kept to the paracetamol, when i had my next doctors appointment said the pharmacist had recommended clove oil he visibly cringed until i explained i hadn’t use it. always read the instructions, human error happens

vicky
,

london,
20/5/2013 10:19

It’s not the pharmacists but the other mainly female assistants who, when I am buying a pack of aspirin, insist on asking ‘are you on any other medication?’ I proceed to list my prescription drugs only to be greeted by an stare of complete incomprehension. What is this all about?

pondlife
,

farnham, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 09:40

Have to say that the pharmacy attached to my doctors is brilliant. Whilst waiting for my appointment it sent two people back to reception to query the drugs that a doctor had prescribed. That is pharmacists who are doing their job – one was left to question whether the doctor knew how to do his.

chrysmum60
,

cheadle.uk,
20/5/2013 09:39

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2327268/How-pharmacies-poor-drugs-advice-Patients-health-risk.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

How three in four pharmacies give poor drugs advice: Patients’ health is being …

  • Which? sent undercover mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies
  • Big chains give a better service than High Street independents
  • Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

By
Jenny Hope

19:11 EST, 19 May 2013


|

19:11 EST, 19 May 2013

Some High Street pharmacies are giving customers poor quality and even dangerous advice about their medicines, claims a new survey.

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy.

The survey showed pharmacies in big chains and supermarkets give a better service than High Street independents.

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

Almost three-quarters of pharmacists did not warn about the hazards of mixing prescription drugs with a heartburn remedy

Which? sent trained undercover mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies across the UK and an expert panel of three experienced pharmacists rated the advice they received.

It found some pharmacies are giving out advice without asking the right questions, with potentially serious consequences for their customers’ health.

Advice from pharmacies was given an unsatisfactory rating in around four in ten (43 per cent) visits overall, almost 10 per cent higher than a previous survey in 2008.

Which? sent mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies

Which? sent mystery shoppers into 122 pharmacies

There was a marked difference in the quality of advice given from different types of pharmacies.
Independent pharmacies gave unsatisfactory advice more than half of the time compared to a third of the time for the leading chains and supermarkets – with no change on the last survey. 

In one scenario, a customer taking the drug warfarin to prevent blood clots requested a heartburn remedy called Pantoloc Control

Pharmacies should have asked basic but important questions about existing prescription medication because it can interfere with warfarin levels in the blood, leading to bleeding problems and even hospitalisation.

But the advice was rated unsatisfactory in 71 per cent of the visits – the worst finding.

On visits where counter assistants dealt with mystery shoppers without consulting a pharmacist, two thirds gave poor advice compared with one in four when involving a pharmacist.

Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said ‘Too many pharmacies are still failing their customers, with some potentially serious consequences.

‘We’re pleased that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the General Pharmaceutical Council recognise our concerns and are taking steps to tackle these issues. ‘Consumers should be able to trust the advice they receive from any pharmacy they visit.’

In a separate snapshot study, Which? also discovered that two-thirds of pharmacies did not follow the professional guidance by failing to explain there is no scientific evidence that homeopathy works.

Martin Astbury, president of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, said ‘The pharmacists I know won’t recognise their own practice in the results Which? have shared with us.

Which? said that chains and supermarkets performed better in their study

Which? said that chains and supermarkets performed better in their study

‘The RPS wants to understand the underlying reasons for the differences highlighted by this report and how to improve consistency of the advice the public receive when they purchase medicines from a pharmacy. There are some areas which require improvement. 

‘We have commissioned the University of Nottingham to look internationally for best practice on the sale of medicines through pharmacy.  We will use the outcomes of this to make recommendations as to how pharmacists’ skills can be used most effectively in Great Britain to ensure the public get the best possible advice.’

The comments below have not been moderated.

Ayzee, 11:56 – you’ve missed out a fairly important bit there, even ignoring the misinformation/nonsense (most nurses aren’t prescribers for example, although some are, to varying degrees of sophistication/complexity). NAmely – diagnosis. Trying to diagnose most conditions from biochemistry or radiology alone would be like trying to sketch a map of the Grand Canyon when you’re only allowed to view four inches of it at a time. Through a pinhole. In the dark.

Yes, the blood tests show kidney failure – but why are the patient’s kidneys not working? There’s a hundred reasons and maybe one or two of them show up on the standard biochemistry tests done quickly in a local lab Not to mention, which tests do you request in the first place? The person who takes a history, examines and assesses the patient, formulates a diagnosis and then a plan (including what tests to do) and then carries it out, including procedures, referrals and prescribing meds, is the doctor. Sound useful yet?

angularboxoid
,

North East, United Kingdom,
21/5/2013 00:07

I have one ruel first before, I take any new medicine that is to read the leaflet that comes with them before I even consider taking it, And if I am still not sure if I should take it or not, I double check with the pharmacy.

trixiemoo
,

rhyl, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 22:17

The advice given by French pharmacists is horrible! They are all big believers in homeopathy and New Age remedies and they push that on people in lieu of conventional medication. And if you insist on conventional medication, eg for an infection, they undermine that choice.

Bliss
,

Paris, France,
20/5/2013 17:08

What about when the staff call out the list of prescription drugs that you’ve come to collect, I had to complain to head office about it and this was at one of the top pharmacies!

Flapjack
,

London, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 14:52

its not the pharmacists, its the ‘medically untrained assistants’ who think they know it all and will argue that two things with the same ingredient in but made by two different companys are totally different, just because the have a generic name and a product brand name….ie..panadol and paracetomol…..i love proving them wrong when they try to sell me the more expensive brand name instead of the cheaper generic name…..they still the say that in their opinion the more expensive brand is better. Its a big con to make you spend more money when you dont need to!

daves wife
,

hampshire, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 14:07

Our local pharmacist used to be a fount of knowledge about everything on the shelves. Last time I sought advice form the new pharmacist, he had to start reading the information on the packaging. There is a decline in standards.

Bram
,

Bushey,
20/5/2013 13:18

Makes you wonder what purpose doctors actually serve. Before you get all worked up, read what I have to say first. Pharmacists have all the knowledge about medications. Biochemists analyse samples from the body and can give a diagnosis for what the samples show. Radiographers look at imaging and can tell you what is wrong from the pictures printed. Nurses do everything else, including leading wards, medication prescribing, sorting out social care, consulting, dealing with bereaved patients and relatives well, delivering bad news, on top of a lot more tasks. Apart from a surgeon, I really fail to see what the purpose of a doctor is. And this is something that seriously needs to be looked at, because doctors get paid far too much for doing far too little. A drain on resources.

Ayzee
,

UK, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 11:56

i’ve only had one issue with the pharmacist, the first time i fell pregnant (aged 25) my first wisdom tooth started coming through it was very painful so spoke to the pharmacist to see what i was able to take while pregnant for pain relief she recommended clove oil, i brought it went home read the instruction leaflet which had a big DO NOT TAKE WHILE PREGNANT. so just kept to the paracetamol, when i had my next doctors appointment said the pharmacist had recommended clove oil he visibly cringed until i explained i hadn’t use it. always read the instructions, human error happens

vicky
,

london,
20/5/2013 10:19

It’s not the pharmacists but the other mainly female assistants who, when I am buying a pack of aspirin, insist on asking ‘are you on any other medication?’ I proceed to list my prescription drugs only to be greeted by an stare of complete incomprehension. What is this all about?

pondlife
,

farnham, United Kingdom,
20/5/2013 09:40

Have to say that the pharmacy attached to my doctors is brilliant. Whilst waiting for my appointment it sent two people back to reception to query the drugs that a doctor had prescribed. That is pharmacists who are doing their job – one was left to question whether the doctor knew how to do his.

chrysmum60
,

cheadle.uk,
20/5/2013 09:39

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2327268/How-pharmacies-poor-drugs-advice-Patients-health-risk.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Does prostate cancer treatment help older, sick men?

By Andrew M. Seaman

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Older men with other illnesses may not live long enough to benefit from aggressive prostate cancer treatments, such as prostate removal or radiation, and they’d have to live with their side effects, says a new study.

“If you’re going to die of a heart attack in five years, what’s the point of going through radiation?” asked Dr. David Penson, the study’s senior author from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.

“The key point is that when men are choosing therapy for prostate cancer, they need to consider their tumor characteristics, their age and other characteristics,” he said.

About one man in every six will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime, according the American Cancer Society (ACS). While it can be a serious disease, the ACS says most men don’t die from the slow-moving cancer.

Still, many choose to have surgery and/or radiation to treat the cancer, even though it can lead to side effects that impact quality of life, including erectile dysfunction, incontinence and other problems (see Reuters Health article of June 27, 2012: http://reut.rs/MpPr4t.)

As an alternative to surgery and radiation, some doctors recommend so-called active surveillance, also known as watchful waiting.

For the new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine on Monday, Penson and his colleagues used data from a national database to see what effects age, other illnesses and tumor characteristics had on risk of death from cancer and other conditions.

The researchers included men between the ages 39 to 89 years old who were diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer between October 1994 and October 1995.

They collected information on the men’s other conditions – including diabetes, heart problems, and strokes – and tracked them through the database over 14 years.

Over that time, the researchers found the risk of dying from high-risk prostate cancer was 18 percent. The risk of dying from low-risk prostate cancer was 3 percent and 7 percent for high-risk disease.

Older men were more likely to die from something else during the 10 years following diagnosis if they had other ailments.

For example, about 40 percent of men between the ages of 61 and 74 years old died within the 10 years after their prostate cancer diagnosis if they had three or more comorbidities, compared to 71 percent of men 75 years old and older.

WEIGHING OPTIONS

“This is just the type of study we need at this time to help us determine who will and will not benefit from treatment,” said Dr. H. Ballentine Carter, a urologist and oncologist at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore.

But Carter, who was not involved with the new study, told Reuters Health it’s important to look at each individual patient.

“For that (75-year-old) guy who has no comorbidities or few, he may be more likely to benefit from treatment than the 60-year-old who has a low-grade tumor and multiple comorbidities,” he said.

“The challenge for the physician is to accurately evaluate the life expectancy of a patient in order to balance the risk for prostate cancer mortality with that of other-cause mortality,” wrote Italian Drs. Lazzaro Repetto, Angela Marie Abbatecola and Giuseppe Paolisso in an editorial accompanying the study.

Penson and his colleagues, caution however, that their results shouldn’t be used to decide whether or not a person should be screened for prostate cancer.

Currently the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a government-backed panel, recommends against prostate cancer screening for average-risk men of all ages.

Earlier this month, the American Urological Association made news when they recommended against screening average-risk men under age 55 or any man over 70 using prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, blood tests (see Reuters Health article of May 3, 2013 here: http://reut.rs/13FUGEe.)

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/Zwi3u5 Annals of Internal Medicine, online May 20, 2013.

Article source: http://news.yahoo.com/does-prostate-cancer-treatment-help-older-sick-men-210243742.html

Depressed women twice as likely to have a stroke: Health risk applies to those …

By
Jenny Hope

18:33 EST, 16 May 2013


|

18:33 EST, 16 May 2013

Women in their 40s and 50s with depression are more than twice as likely to suffer a stroke, warns a landmark study.

Striking evidence suggests that the condition makes them more vulnerable in this age group – younger than previously expected.

In the 12-year study of thousands of women aged 47 to 52, it was found those with depression were 2.4 times more likely to suffer a stroke compared to those without.

Depression is a big factor in giving middle-aged women strokes

Vulnerable: Depression is a key factor in giving middle-aged women strokes

Even after taking out risk factors, depressed women were still nearly twice as likely to suffer a stroke.

Study author Caroline Jackson said current guidelines for stroke prevention overlook the potential role of depression. ‘Doctors need to recognize the serious nature of poor mental health and what effects it can have in the long term,’ she said. ‘We may need more targeted approaches to prevent and treat depression in younger women.’

Depression affects one in ten adults in the UK at any time. There has been a big rise in the prescription of anti-depressants in the last 20 years, particularly for women.

Dr Jackson, an epidemiologist, and colleagues at the University of Queensland analysed results from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. This was the first large-scale study examining the link between depression and stroke in younger middle-aged women.

More than 10,500 answered questions about their mental and physical health and other personal details every three years from 1998-2010.

Elderly woman lying on her bed in an hospital ward

Increase: An American study of an older group of women found a 30 per cent higher risk of stroke among those who were depressed

One in four reported being depressed, based on their replies to a standardised depression scale and recent use of anti-depressants. There were 177 first-time strokes during the study published in Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association.

Researchers took into account factors which can affect stroke risk, such as age, socioeconomic status and lifestyle habits like smoking, drinking and physical activity.

Also considered were physiological conditions such as high blood pressure, heart disease, being overweight and diabetes.

The closest comparison was a US study of women whose average age was 14 years older. This found a 30 per cent higher risk of stroke among those who were depressed.

High blood pressure, heart disease and being overweight also heighten the risk

Contributing factors: High blood pressure, heart disease and being overweight also heighten the risk

Dr Jackson said she would expect similar results to her study in America and Europe.
The reasons for any link are unclear but the effects on blood vessels of the body’s inflammatory and immunological processes may be involved, she said.

Other possible factors are that patients with depression tend to have less healthy diets and take less exercise. They are also less likely to take medicine if they have high blood pressure or cholesterol, both risk factors for stroke.

Some anti-depressants may also slightly raise the threat.

Dr Jackson reassured women that the absolute risk of stroke was still fairly low in this age group.
In the study, about 1.5 per cent of the total had a stroke, rising to just over 2 per cent among those with depression.

The comments below have not been moderated.

So a depressed person reads this and it makes them more depressed! How about some happy news for a change!

Jetty
,

London, United Kingdom,
18/5/2013 20:01

Yes, there is something happening to the DM submission of comments. I also only submitted once one and it appeared twice. I’m getting many times too that the service to go into my profile is not available. I also get that my login-in is also not available – almost everyday. Anyhow…., when it comes to these studies…, what comes first, the chicken or the egg? The same characteristics that ultimately drive your body to a stroke, are the same that would manifest as low energy and drive, which would be immediately – without any further test – make your physician to diagnose you with depression. Although, a stupid inference, it’s how the physicians are trained to go about their diagnosing. Smart, eh?

buttercookies
,

Boston,
18/5/2013 18:52

Yes, there is something happening to the DM submission of comments. I also only submitted once one and it appeared twice. I’m getting many times too that the service to go into my profile is not available. I also get that my login-in is also not available – almost everyday. Anyhow…., when it comes to these studies…, what comes first, the chicken or the egg? The same characteristics that ultimately drive your body to a stroke, are the same that would manifest as low energy and drive, which would be immediately – without any further test – make your physician to diagnose you with depression. Although, a stupid inference, it’s how the physicians are trained to go about their diagnosing. Smart, eh?

buttercookies
,

Boston,
18/5/2013 18:47

No worries John from Taunton, any chance of one of those ice creams, it would fair cheer me up x

carlyle35
,

norwich,
17/5/2013 19:43

no need for tablets,be more loving and forgiving of others. liz , ex, 17/5/2013 11:20 ……………………….. If your comment were true, it would only be unpleasant people who suffered from depression. This isn’t the case at all, it can affect anyone. Likewise there are some pretty unloving, unforgiving people out there who don’t have clinical depression, as these things are in no way connected.

GKJ
,

UK,
17/5/2013 18:45

Apologies guys. I only submitted the article below once but it’s popped up 3 times??

John
,

Taunton,
17/5/2013 16:22

People eat ice cream in the summer. People develop skin cancer in the summer. Therefore eating ice cream causes cancer. See the flaw? This article is another crass example of pseudo-research by pseudo-scientists. Women who are at risk of a stroke are also prone to depression. When will researchers understand cause and effect? Women who don’t exercise, smoke, have poor diets, will tend to put on weight, feel lethargic, and be prone to excess pain and distress during the difficult years of the menopause and the change. The change in hormone level then creates an imbalance in the body’s chemistry, and when combined with low self esteem and impending middle and old age, then depression and stroke can also result. Depression correlates with stroke incidence, it does not cause it. Eating ice cream correlates with incidence of skin cancer. There is a fundamental difference between cause and correlation. This article could cause women unnecessary stress and concern.

John
,

Taunton,
17/5/2013 16:19

People eat ice cream in the summer. People develop skin cancer in the summer. Therefore eating ice cream causes cancer. See the flaw? This article is another crass example of pseudo-research by pseudo-scientists. Women who are at risk of a stroke are also prone to depression. When will researchers understand cause and effect? Women who don’t exercise, smoke, have poor diets, will tend to put on weight, feel lethargic, and be prone to excess pain and distress during the difficult years of the menopause and the change. The change in hormone level then creates an imbalance in the body’s chemistry, and when combined with low self esteem and impending middle and old age, then depression and stroke can also result. Depression correlates with stroke incidence, it does not cause it. Eating ice cream correlates with incidence of skin cancer. There is a fundamental difference between cause and correlation. This article could cause women unnecessary stress and concern.

John
,

Taunton,
17/5/2013 16:19

People eat ice cream in the summer. People develop skin cancer in the summer. Therefore eating ice cream causes cancer. See the flaw? This article is another crass example of pseudo-research by pseudo-scientists. Women who are at risk of a stroke are also prone to depression. When will researchers understand cause and effect? Women who don’t exercise, smoke, have poor diets, will tend to put on weight, feel lethargic, and be prone to excess pain and distress during the difficult years of the menopause and the change. The change in hormone level then creates an imbalance in the body’s chemistry, and when combined with low self esteem and impending middle and old age, then depression and stroke can also result. Depression correlates with stroke incidence, it does not cause it. Eating ice cream correlates with incidence of skin cancer. There is a fundamental difference between cause and correlation. This article could cause women unnecessary stress and concern.

John
,

Taunton,
17/5/2013 16:18

Thought about this a lot. You know what is wrong with this country?? US THE PEOPLE. Women accepted their masculinity, Men accepted their femininity. Now we are almost Asexual and running scared and men are no longer men and women are no longer women and we are so frustrated by not really knowing who we are, we are in danger of disappearing up our own wotsits. We should work as a team, together, Ying and Yang, two halves of a whole. It takes two to make a baby in whatever species you look at, which means we should re-learn how to need each other and take care of each other, not fight against everything all the time. Love and Peace everyone XX

Grumpy Woman
,

Hertfordshire, United Kingdom,
17/5/2013 14:04

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2325805/Depressed-women-twice-likely-stroke-Health-risk-applies-40s-50s-warns-major-new-study.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

A British father has made medical history by having his healthy prostate …

  • Businessman had an increased risk of cancer through the BRCA2 gene
  • He entered a trial at the Institute of Cancer Research as it ran in his family
  • The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are linked to an aggressive form of cancer
  • Angelina Jolie had a double mastectomy after testing positive for BRCA1

By
Amanda Perthen

19:19 EST, 18 May 2013


|

04:29 EST, 19 May 2013

A British father has made medical history by having his healthy prostate removed after discovering that he carries a defective gene that boosts his risk of cancer, it was reported last night.

The businessman’s increased risk of cancer through the BRCA2 gene is believed to  have come to light when he  took part in a trial at the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) in London.

He entered the trial because he has relatives who have suffered from breast or prostate cancer in the past.

Scientists believe that other men who know they are carriers will choose to go down the same route (stock image)

Scientists believe that others who know they are carriers will choose to go down the same route (stock image)

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are known to be linked to an aggressive form of breast cancer.

Last week Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie revealed she had had surgery to remove both her breasts to reduce the risk of getting breast cancer after testing positive for the rogue BRCA1 gene.

In the latest case, the Briton, 53, who is married with children, asked to have his prostate removed so that he could avoid the fate of his relatives.

It is understood that doctors were initially reluctant to perform the operation as removal of the prostate leaves men infertile and can also result in incontinence.

It is believed there were no signs to suggest the man’s prostate was unhealthy.

Online backlash: Some have accused Angelina Jolie of being an attention seeker - a former sex goddess who's past her sell-by date and is now trying to use her medical problems to boost her public profile

Angelina Jolie chose to have a double mastectomy as her chance of developing breast cancer was very high

Roger Kirby, the surgeon who performed the procedure, told The Sunday Times: ‘the relatively low level of cancerous cells we found in this man’s prostate before the operation would these days not normally prompt immendiate surgery to remove the gland, but given what we do know about the nature of BRCA2, it was definitely the right thing to do for this patient.’

Following the surgery, a number of previously undetected BRCA cells were discovered.

WHAT IS PROSTATE CANCER?

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK, with over 40,000 new cases diagnosed every year.

Prostate cancer usually develops slowly, so there may be no signs you have prostate cancer for many years.

Symptoms often only become apparent when your prostate is large enough to affect the urethra (the tube that carries urine from the bladder to the penis).

When this happens, you may notice things like an increased need to urinate, straining while urinating and a feeling your bladder has not fully emptied.

However, these signs do not mean you have prostate cancer. It is more likely they are caused by something else, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (also known as BPH or prostate enlargement).

NHS Choices

Experts say that knowing you are a carrier of the cells is difficult, and that they believe other men may now follow suit.

Prostate cancer affects one in eight men in the UK and there are 10,000 deaths each year.

Angelina Jolie announced earlier this week that she had a double mastectomy as she was a carrier of the BRCA1 gene.

The 37-year-old actress’s decision was made all the more poignant by the fact that Angelina lost her mother Marcheline Bertrand to ovarian cancer when she was just 56.

She paid tribute to her husband Brad Pitt and family who supported her decision.

In an editorial piece in the New York Times entitled ‘My Medical Choice’, Angelina wrote: ‘I am fortunate to have a partner, Brad Pitt, who is so loving and supportive.

‘So to anyone who has a wife or girlfriend going through this, know that you are a very important part of the transition. Brad was at the Pink Lotus Breast Center, where I was treated, for every minute of the surgeries.

Following the operations, Angelina’s risk of contracting breast cancer has now dropped to under five per cent.

She wrote: ‘My doctors estimated that I had an 87 per cent risk of breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman.

For more information on prostate cancer go to NHS Choices.

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

It is up to him. Fine if this is what he wanted to do. Hope you are alright mate, wish you well.

Mary H
,

Aylesbury,
19/5/2013 19:29

My family has had many car wrecks in the past for decades… for various reasons. Some were fatal. I think I’ll go out and set my car on fire just in case… to save myself from a future wreck.
Same mindset, huh?

Animalaura
,

Denison,
19/5/2013 18:32

prostrate cancer and we have to have the obligatory snap of an actress……thankfully that is one cancer we ladies dont get.. I sincerely hope the British father is recovering and wish him all the best for the future

anne
,

sheffield, United Kingdom,
19/5/2013 17:47

On my dads side a lot of aunties and uncles have either had or have died of cancer.My dad is currently battling lung cancer(he also beat bowel cancer). I try not to worry if I will ever get cancer.If it happens,it happens. But I certainly would not have any healthy organs removed just on the basis that it runs in the family.I understand,respect and appreciate other people’s decisions to go through this kind of surgery but ,if proven I was carrying a defective gene, I would just go for check ups.If I would to display symptoms of any kind,I would go to GP without hesitancy and hopefully(fingers crossed,eh?!) it would be caught early. If my organs were riddled then obviously I would have them removed.

BadAngel
,

Hull,
19/5/2013 15:48

Given the hundreds, maybe thousands of women, in North America who’ve been given the advantage of this advise, it is interesting that only one man has. Again, the double standard of medical research and medical care against men.

RobertW
,

UK expat – Manitoba, Canada,
19/5/2013 15:07

Ted of Teddington, very well put, a true realistic comment on Prostate cancer. I know. Cheers David Canada.

David Canada
,

Toronto,
19/5/2013 14:22

Ted of Teddington, very well put, a true realistic comment on Prostate cancer. I know. Cheers David Canada.

David Canada
,

Toronto,
19/5/2013 14:18

We wont use Hemp oil THC, that would be immoral and there is not financial profit in it..

unrealone1
,

melbourne,
19/5/2013 14:02

Idiocy gets ratcheted up yet another notch. Thank you Angelina Jolie

JoeEsty
,

Denver,
19/5/2013 13:40

99% of women DO NOT have those genes. Too many people are running around like headless chickens thinking they need the same procedure.

HaywoodZarathustra
,

Fat City,
19/5/2013 12:56

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2326830/British-father-53-man-world-prostate-removed-bid-beat-Angelina-Jolie-cancer-flaw.html

A British father has made medical history by having his healthy prostate …

  • Businessman had an increased risk of cancer through the BRCA2 gene
  • He entered a trial at the Institute of Cancer Research as it ran in his family
  • The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are linked to an aggressive form of cancer
  • Angelina Jolie had a double mastectomy after testing positive for BRCA1

By
Amanda Perthen

19:19 EST, 18 May 2013


|

04:29 EST, 19 May 2013

A British father has made medical history by having his healthy prostate removed after discovering that he carries a defective gene that boosts his risk of cancer, it was reported last night.

The businessman’s increased risk of cancer through the BRCA2 gene is believed to  have come to light when he  took part in a trial at the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) in London.

He entered the trial because he has relatives who have suffered from breast or prostate cancer in the past.

Scientists believe that other men who know they are carriers will choose to go down the same route (stock image)

Scientists believe that others who know they are carriers will choose to go down the same route (stock image)

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are known to be linked to an aggressive form of breast cancer.

Last week Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie revealed she had had surgery to remove both her breasts to reduce the risk of getting breast cancer after testing positive for the rogue BRCA1 gene.

In the latest case, the Briton, 53, who is married with children, asked to have his prostate removed so that he could avoid the fate of his relatives.

It is understood that doctors were initially reluctant to perform the operation as removal of the prostate leaves men infertile and can also result in incontinence.

It is believed there were no signs to suggest the man’s prostate was unhealthy.

Online backlash: Some have accused Angelina Jolie of being an attention seeker - a former sex goddess who's past her sell-by date and is now trying to use her medical problems to boost her public profile

Angelina Jolie chose to have a double mastectomy as her chance of developing breast cancer was very high

Roger Kirby, the surgeon who performed the procedure, told The Sunday Times: ‘the relatively low level of cancerous cells we found in this man’s prostate before the operation would these days not normally prompt immendiate surgery to remove the gland, but given what we do know about the nature of BRCA2, it was definitely the right thing to do for this patient.’

Following the surgery, a number of previously undetected BRCA cells were discovered.

WHAT IS PROSTATE CANCER?

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK, with over 40,000 new cases diagnosed every year.

Prostate cancer usually develops slowly, so there may be no signs you have prostate cancer for many years.

Symptoms often only become apparent when your prostate is large enough to affect the urethra (the tube that carries urine from the bladder to the penis).

When this happens, you may notice things like an increased need to urinate, straining while urinating and a feeling your bladder has not fully emptied.

However, these signs do not mean you have prostate cancer. It is more likely they are caused by something else, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (also known as BPH or prostate enlargement).

NHS Choices

Experts say that knowing you are a carrier of the cells is difficult, and that they believe other men may now follow suit.

Prostate cancer affects one in eight men in the UK and there are 10,000 deaths each year.

Angelina Jolie announced earlier this week that she had a double mastectomy as she was a carrier of the BRCA1 gene.

The 37-year-old actress’s decision was made all the more poignant by the fact that Angelina lost her mother Marcheline Bertrand to ovarian cancer when she was just 56.

She paid tribute to her husband Brad Pitt and family who supported her decision.

In an editorial piece in the New York Times entitled ‘My Medical Choice’, Angelina wrote: ‘I am fortunate to have a partner, Brad Pitt, who is so loving and supportive.

‘So to anyone who has a wife or girlfriend going through this, know that you are a very important part of the transition. Brad was at the Pink Lotus Breast Center, where I was treated, for every minute of the surgeries.

Following the operations, Angelina’s risk of contracting breast cancer has now dropped to under five per cent.

She wrote: ‘My doctors estimated that I had an 87 per cent risk of breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman.

For more information on prostate cancer go to NHS Choices.

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

It is up to him. Fine if this is what he wanted to do. Hope you are alright mate, wish you well.

Mary H
,

Aylesbury,
19/5/2013 19:29

My family has had many car wrecks in the past for decades… for various reasons. Some were fatal. I think I’ll go out and set my car on fire just in case… to save myself from a future wreck.
Same mindset, huh?

Animalaura
,

Denison,
19/5/2013 18:32

prostrate cancer and we have to have the obligatory snap of an actress……thankfully that is one cancer we ladies dont get.. I sincerely hope the British father is recovering and wish him all the best for the future

anne
,

sheffield, United Kingdom,
19/5/2013 17:47

On my dads side a lot of aunties and uncles have either had or have died of cancer.My dad is currently battling lung cancer(he also beat bowel cancer). I try not to worry if I will ever get cancer.If it happens,it happens. But I certainly would not have any healthy organs removed just on the basis that it runs in the family.I understand,respect and appreciate other people’s decisions to go through this kind of surgery but ,if proven I was carrying a defective gene, I would just go for check ups.If I would to display symptoms of any kind,I would go to GP without hesitancy and hopefully(fingers crossed,eh?!) it would be caught early. If my organs were riddled then obviously I would have them removed.

BadAngel
,

Hull,
19/5/2013 15:48

Given the hundreds, maybe thousands of women, in North America who’ve been given the advantage of this advise, it is interesting that only one man has. Again, the double standard of medical research and medical care against men.

RobertW
,

UK expat – Manitoba, Canada,
19/5/2013 15:07

Ted of Teddington, very well put, a true realistic comment on Prostate cancer. I know. Cheers David Canada.

David Canada
,

Toronto,
19/5/2013 14:22

Ted of Teddington, very well put, a true realistic comment on Prostate cancer. I know. Cheers David Canada.

David Canada
,

Toronto,
19/5/2013 14:18

We wont use Hemp oil THC, that would be immoral and there is not financial profit in it..

unrealone1
,

melbourne,
19/5/2013 14:02

Idiocy gets ratcheted up yet another notch. Thank you Angelina Jolie

JoeEsty
,

Denver,
19/5/2013 13:40

99% of women DO NOT have those genes. Too many people are running around like headless chickens thinking they need the same procedure.

HaywoodZarathustra
,

Fat City,
19/5/2013 12:56

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Article source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2326830/British-father-53-man-world-prostate-removed-bid-beat-Angelina-Jolie-cancer-flaw.html